An essential component in every instructional designer's tool box

Wrangling content from different sources, from a variety of subject-matter experts and team members, and tying everything back to just the essential performance objectives and metrics- all within budget and meeting your deadlines can get crazy.  How does one keep everything straight?

Personally, I would not be able to keep everything together without mind mapping software.  Here is a pearl containing 5 of the top mind mapping tools currently on the market.

 Mind mapping software 

I first learned about mind mapping software when I was beginning my instructional design career at The Florida State University, and a professor introduced us to an application called Inspiration.  While inspiration is still around, I'm since moved on to Mindjet's MindManager 2012 product because of the robustness of the feature set.  From a purely objective viewpoint, being able to manage a project as well as keep your content organized all within the same file is something I believe every designer should experience.  And if your client demands it in MS Word, Adobe .pdf, or a host of other formats-not a problem.  You can simply export it into the format of their choice and send it off. 

This little pearl is one of the secrets to my success.  What are some of yours?  Please comment.

What is your Learning Management resolution for 2013?

If there was ever a market ripe for disruption it would be the learning management market.  While I don’t have any stats- anecdotally speaking, so many organizations and universities are fed up with the major players the field is wide open for new entrants.  Many of the prospects we speak to who are currently shopping are simply not impressed with the current crop of LMSs out there, or find the costs too big a burden to bear. 

Never fear training managers.  A new year is among us, and with it come new players and bigger and more efficient technologies.  One player who I will be tracking and whose product is still in “beta” is Pearson’s OpenClass™.

Pearson has a well-articulated vision of learning, and is enticing institutions of higher learning with their favorite price.  It’ll be interesting to see this platform compete with some of the more established players in the market, as well as how it will overcome the resistance of many IT shops.

Do you have a Learning Management resolution for 2013?  If so, do share.  I’d love to hear it.

How much is this e-learning going to cost me?

There is a great lesson here for instructional designers, and one that took me awhile to master.  The single largest cost in the development of e-learning is the design and development of rich media assets like custom-animation, music or video.  It’s always challenging working with a new client who is jumping ahead and asking me to “ballpark estimate” the cost of the project. 

About halfway down this article, you’ll find the following:

"Unlike some other online-education services, which offer back-of-the-auditorium access to university lectures, Craftsy spends upward of $15,000 to develop and film each class."

The way to handle this with your clients is to give them options.  I tell our clients, “I am going to let you drive the costs of this project based on your choice of instructional strategy.”  In other words, on the low side- you can have this very basic way of communicating your content with some degree of interactivity, little to no voice-over, and plenty of iStock photography and imagery.  On the medium-budget range, our graphics department will develop most if not all of the look and feel of the course; you’ll get a custom UI, the entire course voiced over by a professional voice actor, and a good degree of interactivity.  And finally, on the high-side, we will go with all of the bells and whistles including the development of custom graphics, animation and video, and a very high degree of learner engagement and interactivity.  The key is to give them the option of how much to spend, to achieve the quality of courseware they desire without sacrificing the instructional design. 

E-learning development costs.

In my opinion, the advancement of tools like Articulate Storyline and Adobe Captivate has brought down the time and expense of authoring to the point where course authoring is no longer the largest expense in a project.  While I certainly do not compromise on the integrity of the instructional materials, many clients come into projects with very unrealistic expectations of what cost drivers are for their training projects. 

I ask you, how many clients afford you the luxury of a $15,000 multimedia development budget?  Please comment. 

Are you designing instruction for glass surfaces yet? If not, you will be soon.

Just read another wonderful piece over at The Total Learner Experience and while I don’t necessarily agree with all of their points- I do reckon mobile learning is poised to make big inroads into our instructional design efforts.  One of my few gripes with the piece is the notion that―

“The way you conceptualize content experiences now should be mobile-first, rather than PC first. The PC era is behind us.”

A learner accessing a course on an iPhone.
A learner accessing a course on an iPhone.

While I believe the decline of the PC as our primary computing hub is certainly on the decline, I believe it will take some time for the PC’s demise.  That said, in talking to my clients we always bring up the ability to go mobile with their training efforts and quite frankly many of them are still quite skeptical and/ or simply not ready to venture down this path. 

I’d love to hear from other designers if they get the same push back as we get.  Are your clients venturing down the mobile-learning road?  What are your thoughts on this issue?


Alex Santos

Alex is a co-founder and Managing Member of Collabor8 Learning, LLC, an instructional design and performance management consultancy. His firm collaborates with organizations to enhance the way they develop  and train their people. To learn more about Collabor8 Learning, click here.

Alex can be reached at 786-512-1069, alex@collabor8learning.com or via Twitter@collabor8alex.

5 Takeaways from GE’s internal social networking efforts

I just finished reading a great interview with Ron Utterbeck from GE, covering the company’s internal social networking efforts and am once again amazed at how this technology is revolutionizing how we work.  GE is using it to consolidate a mish mash of collaboration tools its people were already using and with great results.  Believe it or not, guess what?  Your people are also using these tools to connect, chat, exchange ideas, share files and eliminate road blocks to their productivity - whether or not you approve of them doing so!  Don’t believe me?  Get with the program! There are quite a few takeaways from this interview, but five that I feel bear stressing.

1.        Have a goal. 

Deploying an internal social networking tool, like any strategic technology investment, should have at its core the solution of a problem or the achievement of a goal.  This tidbit cannot be stressed enough.  And we’re not talking SMART goals here as we do with our training programs, or goals of meeting a specific ROI target as a result of the initiative.  You need goals that stretch the capabilities of what your people can achieve collaboratively by using the technology as opposed to continuing to operate as you have been.  If the tool doesn't help your people achieve stretch goals, its value proposition will diminish in the eyes of your users and usage will drop.

2.       Brand it.

Although this didn't really come up in the interview with Ron, branding the tool will give it a personality and the right branding could spell success or failure.  The branding should be aligned with your goals for the social network, as well as the values you wish to promote throughout your culture with the tool.  Want to increase collaboration and improve employee engagement?  Heck, launch a contest and have cross-functional teams of employees develop the brand for you!  What better way to engender them to it and give them a stake in its success.

3.       Start small, launch fast.

Organizations at times have a tendency to treat internal products and services as they do their client facing ones in the sense that it doesn't get rolled out until it’s perfect, polished, and has undergone numerous rounds of quality control reviews.  Only then do they see the light of day.  Yet, in this instance, getting it out there and gathering input should be the priority.  The main reason- the organization has no way of knowing beforehand how its users will use the network, and which features will gain prominent use in the network.  It’s important to get it out there, and track what works and what doesn't, and based on user requests for functionality develop and improve on the platform’s capabilities.

4.       Let users drive the evolution of it. 

Social networks should evolve iteratively based on users’ demands on the network and the value gained from prioritizing certain improvements over others.  Or, as Orwell would have it- All improvements are equal but some improvements are more equal than others.  There is no way that management can anticipate the many ways its people will use the network, and should therefore allow the growth and evolution of the platform to be driven by feedback from its users.  Notice how GE launched with a small group of power users and provided easy to use feedback mechanisms to learn what was working and what users wanted to see.

5.       Training is essential.

Being a highly collaborative team of instructional designers, we couldn't help but notice GE’s emphasis on training their people on using good judgment when using the network.  It might be tempting to cut the proverbial corner and deploy an internal social network without it- but be familiar with the risks and liability you are exposing yourself to by doing this.  You can expect inappropriate information to be shared for all to see, maybe even confidential business plans without this crucial component of the rollout.  Is this really a risk you are willing to take?  We don’t recommend it, and encourage you to contact us for a brief conversation about your training needs for the project.

"We believe social media and online communities can be a great way for GE employees to share expertise and perspectives with their family, friends, colleagues, customers or potential employees around the globe or down the street. But it’s important to know what should or should not be shared. We teach them the basics and how to use good judgment."  -Ron Utterbeck

Internal social networks can be a blessing for your corporate culture.  GE is realizing tremendous benefits from its ability to leverage the company’s collective knowledge and so can you.  Developed and deployed properly, your business stands to gain insights about your employees, your products, and your customers that you would have never gleaned otherwise.  This knowledge can become an incredible business driver, and can give you a competitive advantage in your market.

Alex Santos
Alex is a co-founder and Managing Member of Collabor8 Learning, LLC, an instructional design and performance management consultancy. His firm collaborates with organizations to enhance the way they develop  and train their people. To learn more about Collabor8 Learning, click here.

Alex can be reached at 786-512-1069, alex@collabor8learning.com or via Twitter@collabor8alex.